NO JUSTICE: Divided Supreme Court says part of immigration law that could have been used to deport the "Yonkers Voice" Child Molester #RuiBenros is too vague

SURPRISE: Trump pick Gorsuch casts deciding Supreme Court vote against deporting the infamous #Yonkers Childlover from Cape Verde 

SCOTUS SCREWUP: Justices nix part of law requiring deportation of immigrants, like #RuiBenros convicted of crimes like pedophilia 

THERE OUGHT TO BE A LAW: President Donald J. Trump says legislation needed after Supreme Court ruling on protecting immigrant kid loving creeps 

Gorsuch Did Not Side With ‘The Liberals,’ He Sided With Antonin Scalia

The only thing Gorsuch and the liberals agreed on was that Clarence Thomas is an idiot.

Instead Gorsuch merely agreed with his predecessor, Antonin Scalia, that vagueness is a thing.

He then proceeded to have a grand originalist-off against Clarence Thomas — who doesn’t really think vagueness is a valid reason to declare laws unconstitutional.

The only surprising thing, then, is that Gorsuch took the opportunity to slam Thomas, as did Kagan in her majority opinion.

That Thomas is a crazy person is really the only thing both sides were able to agree on. Both Roberts and Thomas wrote out dissents, but Thomas was called out, again and again, by both Kagan and Gorsuch.

Given our times, the fact that Trump’s handpicked Justice who sits in a seat stolen by Senate Republicans bucked administration policy — on immigration no less — is significant.

But, we are about a week out from the Travel Ban arguments and Gorsuch’s willingness to disagree with the president is noted.

please Read More Here:

DAILY NEWS >>>> SCOTUS nixes part of law requiring deportation of immigrants convicted of some crimes

Lawyers for Dimaya appealed the removal arguing that it was unconstitutionally vague and that their client never had fair notice that his crimes would result in deportation.

They suggested the reasoning of a 2015 Scalia opinion, which struck a provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act as unconstitutionally vague, should extend to their case.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Dimaya's favor.

"The Supreme Court delivered a resounding message today: You can't banish a person from his home and family without clear lines, announced up front. Congress cannot write a mushy standard that leaves it to unaccountable immigration officials and judges to make it up as they go along,"......

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-blasts-immigration-ruling-made-scotus-pick-neil-gorsuch-article-1.3938977